Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Nox Nextgen Pro Attack 3K
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 wins by 14 points
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 scores 91/100 against 77/100 for the Nox Nextgen Pro Attack 3K. Its biggest edge is power (+14). The Nox Nextgen Pro Attack 3K answers back on sweet spot (+2).
“The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.”
“The Nextgen Pro Attack 3K is the aggressive end of Nox's development line: a head-heavy 375 g diamond scoring power 80 with the genre's standard invoice: control 66, comfort 64, tolerance 63. Core documentation is incomplete, so check the specimen. Value 78 keeps the development-line logic intact: real violence, Nox construction, sub-Future pricing. The buyer is the improving attacker committed to the brand and the style but not yet to flagship money; the frame serves that buyer honestly and punishes everyone else on schedule. The Future Attack justifies its premium once technique arrives.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
