Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 vs Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 wins by 18 points
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 scores 94/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+29). On price, the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 is currently €123 cheaper.
“The Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 takes the same 365g Black EVA formula that already works on the Technical Viper Soft and wraps it in Juan Lebrón's signature diamond shell. Power eases back from the standard Viper JL's tour-level peak to a still-strong 82, and in exchange control and comfort both climb into the high 70s/80s — a genuinely balanced racket rather than a compromise. Maneuverability improves too, so the head-heavy diamond feels less punishing to hustle at net. The catch is coverage: it is stocked at a single retailer so far, and priced at parity with the far more aggressive standard Viper JL, so this is not the discount play the Technical Soft is.”
“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
