Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 vs Enebe Response Alu
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 wins by 18 points
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 scores 94/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Response Alu. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+28). On price, the Enebe Response Alu is currently €143 cheaper.
“The Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 takes the same 365g Black EVA formula that already works on the Technical Viper Soft and wraps it in Juan Lebrón's signature diamond shell. Power eases back from the standard Viper JL's tour-level peak to a still-strong 82, and in exchange control and comfort both climb into the high 70s/80s — a genuinely balanced racket rather than a compromise. Maneuverability improves too, so the head-heavy diamond feels less punishing to hustle at net. The catch is coverage: it is stocked at a single retailer so far, and priced at parity with the far more aggressive standard Viper JL, so this is not the discount play the Technical Soft is.”
“The Response Alu 2025 is the aluminium-liveried mid-tier of Enebe's Response family: an 18K face over EVA scoring power 77 with the standard firm-ish terms (control 68, comfort 67, tolerance 66) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 74 trails the family's 24K star. The buying logic within this brand never changes: the Response 24K carries a denser face and better arithmetic, the Mustang vintages hit harder for less, and the Alu earns its place only via discount. The frame is honest; the family is crowded. Compare before committing.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
