padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Black Crown

Crown Coyote Carbon 3K

74
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 17 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 74/100 for the Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K. Its biggest edge is power (+18). The Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K answers back on sweet spot (+8). On price, the Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K is currently €60 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
74/100
91/100Best
Control
70
78Best
Power
72
90Best
Sweet spot
74Best
66
Maneuverability
76Best
72
Comfort
73Best
67
Specs
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
365 g
375 g
Core
EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 12K
Level
Advanced
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K

The Crown Coyote Carbon 3K is a mid-tier round-shaped racket that leans into power but struggles to fully deliver on that promise, with a 3K carbon weave that offers adequate stiffness without the refined feel of premium 12K or 18K alternatives. The head-light balance aids maneuverability and makes it reasonably comfortable for longer sessions, though the EVA core can transmit vibration at full swing, making it a mixed proposition for advanced players. Players stepping up from intermediate who want an approachable power-oriented round frame may find it serviceable, but at its price point the competition from established brands is significantly sharper.

100at TennisPoint ESReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05