padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Black Crown

Crown Coyote Carbon 3K

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 17 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 74/100 da Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+18). A Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K responde em ponto doce (+8). Em preço, a Black Crown Crown Coyote Carbon 3K está atualmente €60 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
74/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
70
78Melhor
Potência
72
90Melhor
Ponto doce
74Melhor
66
Manobrabilidade
76Melhor
72
Conforto
73Melhor
67
Especificações
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Cabeça leve
Equilibrado
Peso
365 g
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Nível
Avançado
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Crown Coyote Carbon 3K

The Crown Coyote Carbon 3K is a mid-tier round-shaped racket that leans into power but struggles to fully deliver on that promise, with a 3K carbon weave that offers adequate stiffness without the refined feel of premium 12K or 18K alternatives. The head-light balance aids maneuverability and makes it reasonably comfortable for longer sessions, though the EVA core can transmit vibration at full swing, making it a mixed proposition for advanced players. Players stepping up from intermediate who want an approachable power-oriented round frame may find it serviceable, but at its price point the competition from established brands is significantly sharper.

100em TennisPoint ESAnálise e preços
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05