Bullpadel Neuron 25 vs Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Bullpadel Neuron 25 wins by 14 points
Bullpadel Neuron 25 scores 90/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is control (+14). On price, the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 is currently €20 cheaper.
“The Neuron 25 hands the flagship Neuron's build, multilayer EVA behind a Carbon 3K face, to the intermediate bracket, and the translation works. Power 87 gives improving attackers a real overhead; control 82 keeps the rest of the game from unravelling while technique catches up. The even-balance round profile is easy to live with in fast exchanges, and value 78 makes the price defensible. It still hits firmer than typical intermediate frames (comfort 69, tolerance 68), so players stepping up from a soft beginner racket will notice the extra honesty. A convincing bridge to tour-style padel.”
“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
