Bullpadel Neuron 25 vs Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Bullpadel Neuron 25 wins by 14 points
Bullpadel Neuron 25 scores 90/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is control (+14). On price, the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2 is currently €30 cheaper.
“The Neuron 25 hands the flagship Neuron's build, multilayer EVA behind a Carbon 3K face, to the intermediate bracket, and the translation works. Power 87 gives improving attackers a real overhead; control 82 keeps the rest of the game from unravelling while technique catches up. The even-balance round profile is easy to live with in fast exchanges, and value 78 makes the price defensible. It still hits firmer than typical intermediate frames (comfort 69, tolerance 68), so players stepping up from a soft beginner racket will notice the extra honesty. A convincing bridge to tour-style padel.”
“The Combat 7.1 V2 is Enebe's lively mid-tier attacker: an HR3 foam core under a 3K face scoring power 78 with the springy response the foam brings. Control 68, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold the standard firm line, and weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is strong. The HR3 core is the differentiator within Enebe's own crowded shelf: where the Mustang hits dense and direct, the Combat hits lively and quick. Between them, buy on feel preference and the week's price; both are honest working-brand attackers with sound arithmetic.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
