Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia wins by 20 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia scores 96/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+34). On price, the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 is currently €73 cheaper.
“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.”
“The Xtrem Lite is the 2026 AT10 built for players who want Tapia's crispness at a weight that does not tax the shoulder: 365 g, even balance, teardrop head. The 12K carbon face over an EVA core keeps the strike snappy, and maneuverability 76 means the frame is on time at the net where heavier AT10s run late. Power 85 still finishes club-level points; control 79 keeps bandejas composed. Comfort 70 and tolerance 69 are liveable for the class. Value 72 is the only modest number: you pay signature money for the lighter build. A very easy racket to play well.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
