Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia wins by 15 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia scores 91/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is control (+12). On price, the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 is currently €87 cheaper.
“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.”
“The 12K Alum Xtrem is the AT10 for players who want Tapia's attacking DNA with a slightly softer entry point. The 12K carbon face reads a touch more forgiving than the 18K on off-pace contact, while the teardrop shape and even balance keep the frame honest through bandejas and transitions. Power 88 finishes points; control 80 keeps the rest of your game intact. Comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are the familiar tax on a frame this capable. At value 78 it undercuts the flagship while giving away very little, which makes it the sensible pick in the range.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
