Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2 vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 22 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+28). On price, the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2 is currently €180 cheaper.
“The Combat 7.1 V2 is Enebe's lively mid-tier attacker: an HR3 foam core under a 3K face scoring power 78 with the springy response the foam brings. Control 68, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold the standard firm line, and weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is strong. The HR3 core is the differentiator within Enebe's own crowded shelf: where the Mustang hits dense and direct, the Combat hits lively and quick. Between them, buy on feel preference and the week's price; both are honest working-brand attackers with sound arithmetic.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool