Enebe Full Tubular Carbon vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 15 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 87/100 against 72/100 for the Enebe Full Tubular Carbon. Its biggest edge is power (+15). The Enebe Full Tubular Carbon answers back on comfort (+5). On price, the Enebe Full Tubular Carbon is currently €137 cheaper.
“Badged 'RS 9.1' on the racket itself, the Full Tubular Carbon pairs a firmer HR3 EVA core with a fibreglass face in a round, all-court build. Enebe's full-tubular carbon frame construction adds genuine structural rigidity.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool