Enebe Response 24K vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 19 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 79/100 for the Enebe Response 24K. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+28). On price, the Enebe Response 24K is currently €142 cheaper.
“The Response 24K Violet is the EVA-cored colour variant of Enebe's premium-face bargain: the same genuine 24K weave, power 81 and crisp report, with the standard firm terms (control 69, comfort 66, tolerance 65). The Violet edition carries a small premium over the standard Response, dropping value to 70, and swaps the HR3 core for conventional EVA, a slightly less lively strike. The buying logic is simple: if the violet finish matters, the racket underneath remains sound; if it does not, the standard Response 24K is the same idea with better numbers and a better price.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool