Enebe Response Royal vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 25 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 73/100 for the Enebe Response Royal. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+27).
“The Response Royal is the soft entry of Enebe's Response family: an HR3 core under a fibreglass face scoring power 74 with the liveliest terms in the line's lower tier (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is honest. The HR3 spring plus fibreglass civility makes this the Response for improving players not yet ready for the 24K's crisp demands. The family rule is well-worn by now: Enebe's shelf is crowded and honest, so buy the edition whose feel and price align in the week you shop.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool