Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia wins by 18 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia scores 91/100 against 73/100 for the Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2. Its biggest edge is power (+15). The Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 answers back on sweet spot (+1). On price, the Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 is currently €87 cheaper.
“The RSX 7.1 Carbon V2 is Enebe's budget HR3 offer: the lively foam core under a 3K face scoring a moderate 73/67 split with fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (70). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is solid. The HR3 spring at this money is the quiet draw, giving improving players the lively response usually reserved for the Combat and Aerox a shelf up. The Enebe verdict is a chorus by now: honest equipment, crowded shelf, buy the edition whose price and feel align. The RSX frequently qualifies.”
“The 12K Alum Xtrem is the AT10 for players who want Tapia's attacking DNA with a slightly softer entry point. The 12K carbon face reads a touch more forgiving than the 18K on off-pace contact, while the teardrop shape and even balance keep the frame honest through bandejas and transitions. Power 88 finishes points; control 80 keeps the rest of your game intact. Comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are the familiar tax on a frame this capable. At value 78 it undercuts the flagship while giving away very little, which makes it the sensible pick in the range.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
