padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Enebe

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2

73
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 18 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 73/100 for the Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2. Its biggest edge is power (+17). The Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 answers back on sweet spot (+2). On price, the Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 is currently €50 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
73/100
91/100Best
Control
67
78Best
Power
73
90Best
Sweet spot
68Best
66
Maneuverability
70
72Best
Comfort
68Best
67
Specs
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even
Even
Weight
375 g
Core
HR3 EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2

The RSX 7.1 Carbon V2 is Enebe's budget HR3 offer: the lively foam core under a 3K face scoring a moderate 73/67 split with fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (70). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is solid. The HR3 spring at this money is the quiet draw, giving improving players the lively response usually reserved for the Combat and Aerox a shelf up. The Enebe verdict is a chorus by now: honest equipment, crowded shelf, buy the edition whose price and feel align. The RSX frequently qualifies.

110at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05