padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Enebe

Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 18 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 73/100 de la Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+17). La Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 responde en punto dulce (+2). En precio, la Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2 está actualmente €50 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
73/100
91/100Mejor
Control
67
78Mejor
Potencia
73
90Mejor
Punto dulce
68Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
70
72Mejor
Comodidad
68Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
HR3 EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Enebe Rsx 7.1 Carbon V 2

The RSX 7.1 Carbon V2 is Enebe's budget HR3 offer: the lively foam core under a 3K face scoring a moderate 73/67 split with fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (70). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is solid. The HR3 spring at this money is the quiet draw, giving improving players the lively response usually reserved for the Combat and Aerox a shelf up. The Enebe verdict is a chorus by now: honest equipment, crowded shelf, buy the edition whose price and feel align. The RSX frequently qualifies.

110en PadelNuestroReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05