Kombat Etna 2026 By Manu Martin vs Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2 wins by 8 points
Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2 scores 85/100 against 77/100 for the Kombat Etna 2026 By Manu Martin. Its biggest edge is control (+14). The Kombat Etna 2026 By Manu Martin answers back on power (+1). On price, the Kombat Etna 2026 By Manu Martin is currently €65 cheaper.
“The Kombat Etna 2026 by Manu Martin is a mid-range diamond-shaped racket aimed at aggressive intermediate players seeking extra punch, but it lacks the refinement and feel consistency needed to truly compete with established brands at a similar price point. On-court it delivers decent smash power but can feel stiff and unforgiving on off-centre hits, making control placement a real challenge under pressure. Players who prioritize raw attack over finesse may find it serviceable, but those with any arm sensitivity or demanding touch play will quickly outgrow it.”
“The Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2 is a round-to-teardrop hybrid that attempts to balance offensive punch with playability, but its identity feels somewhat undefined compared to more specialized competitors in its class. The feel is moderately stiff with a firm response on contact, making it best suited for intermediate players transitioning toward aggressive play who want some power without fully sacrificing control. Wilson's padel line still lags behind Tier 1 Spanish brands in materials refinement and court reputation, and at its price point there are sharper options available.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
