Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Nox X Auro
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia wins by 20 points
Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia scores 92/100 against 72/100 for the Nox X Auro. Its biggest edge is power (+31). The Nox X Auro answers back on sweet spot (+14). On price, the Nox X Auro is currently €130 cheaper.
“The Attack version of Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K trades the standard model's manners for outright violence. The diamond head and 18K carbon face produce smash pace in the same conversation as anything we have scored (power 93), and the black EVA core keeps that pace honest on drives. The cost is real: control drops to 75, comfort 64 and tolerance 63 make it one of the most demanding frames in the range, and the head needs muscling at the net (maneuverability 68). This is a professional attacker's finisher. If your bandeja is a rally shot rather than a reset, look at the standard Genius instead.”
“The X Auro 2026 is Nox's budget control offer: an HR3 core in a 365 g build scoring control 74 with kind terms (comfort 75, tolerance 77) and prompt handling (76). Power 62 states the brief. Face documentation is incomplete. Value 82 is excellent. The HR3 core's absorption suits the placement game perfectly: blocks die, lobs obey, arms survive. Alongside the Equation family, the X Auro completes Nox's quiet domination of the sensible end of the market: kind, competent, absurdly priced. Placement-first improvers should shortlist it with the Equation Soft.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool