Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 vs Siux Trilogy Go 4
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 24 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 74/100 for the Siux Trilogy Go 4. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+25).
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
“The Trilogy Go 4 is the superseded gateway: a head-light 375 g build with a Soft EVA core and 3K face scoring a moderate 74/67 split with fair terms (comfort 69, tolerance 68). Value 78 trails the Go 5's arithmetic slightly, which inverts the usual vintage rule: here the newer edition, with its weight options and better price, is actually the smarter buy unless clearance moves this one below it. The frame itself is a perfectly kind, forgiving entry Siux. The family guidance stands: cheapest Go wins, and this one needs a discount to be it.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool