Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 vs Softee Trionic Light
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 30 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 68/100 for the Softee Trionic Light. Its biggest edge is power (+32).
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
“The Trionic Light is Softee's featherweight offer: a 340 g even-balanced Soft EVA build under a fibreglass face scoring maneuverability 73 with kind terms (comfort 70, tolerance 70) and a gentle 66/65 split. Value 78 is honest. At this weight the brand's usual value-shelf story gains a real distinction: 340 g with documentation is scarce at Softee money, which matters to lighter-framed players and arm-managers more than any badge. The benchmarks still lead on outright arithmetic; the Trionic argues on grams instead, and fairly.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool