padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon
Adidas

Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 10 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 81/100 de la Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+11). En precio, la Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red está actualmente €10 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
81/100
91/100Mejor
Control
67
78Mejor
Potencia
85
90Mejor
Punto dulce
62
66Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
72Mejor
Comodidad
64
67Mejor
Especificaciones
Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
368 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA suave
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Adidas Arrow Hit Hexagon

The Arrow Hit Hexagon is adidas's budget bruiser: a Soft EVA core under a 3K face producing power 85, real finishing pace, at value 79. The soft core takes a fraction of sting out without diluting the hit. The scorecard's fine print matters here: control 67 is among the loosest we score, so this frame amplifies whatever discipline you bring and punishes whatever you lack, with comfort 64 and tolerance 62 continuing the strict theme. Maneuverability 66 wants anticipation at the net. For committed budget-conscious attackers with sound technique the value is real; for developing games it is a handful at any price.

170en PadelNuestroReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05