padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Dunlop Aero Star Lite

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Dunlop Aero Star Lite
Dunlop

Dunlop Aero Star Lite

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 18 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 73/100 de la Dunlop Aero Star Lite. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+20). La Dunlop Aero Star Lite responde en punto dulce (+7).

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Dunlop Aero Star Lite
General
91/100Mejor
73/100
Control
74Mejor
66
Potencia
94Mejor
74
Punto dulce
61
68Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
70Mejor
Comodidad
62
69Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Dunlop Aero Star Lite
Forma
Diamante
Diamante
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Cabeza pesada
Peso
365–375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Principiante
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Dunlop Aero Star Lite

The Aero Star Lite is Dunlop's 2021 beginner diamond, a mispositioned veteran: head-heavy geometry producing power 74, which teaches new players attacking shapes while punishing their contact (control 66, tolerance 68). Comfort 69 is fair. Weight and face documentation is incomplete on what remains. Value 76 reflects deep clearance. The honest use case is narrow: athletic converts who want head-heavy geometry cheaply and will outgrow the frame before its limits matter. True beginners should take the Galactica Team's even balance instead. Surviving stock is old; inspect accordingly.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05