padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon
Legend

Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 14 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 77/100 de la Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+16). La Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon responde en punto dulce (+4).

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon
General
91/100Mejor
77/100
Control
74Mejor
69
Potencia
94Mejor
78
Punto dulce
61
65Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
68Mejor
Comodidad
62
66Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon
Forma
Diamante
Lágrima
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Equilibrado
Peso
365–375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Legend Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon

The Shadow Gold Ultra Luxury 15K Carbon spends most of its energy on its name. The scores describe a competent mid-tier attacker: power 78, control 69, firm-but-fair terms (comfort 66, tolerance 65), honest handling (68). Face documentation does not actually confirm the advertised 15K weave, and weight is unlisted: the demo is the only audit. Value 70 prices the adjectives. The frame underneath appears perfectly serviceable; nothing about it is ultra, luxury, or gold except the paint. Buy it as a decent mid-tier attacker at a fair discount, or buy the adjectives elsewhere for less.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05