padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Deus II

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 8 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 83/100 de la Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+12). La Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II responde en punto dulce (+8). En precio, la Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 está actualmente €362 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Cork Extreme Deus II
General
91/100Mejor
83/100
Control
74
76Mejor
Potencia
94Mejor
82
Punto dulce
61
69Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
71Mejor
Comodidad
62
70Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Cork Extreme Deus II
Forma
Diamante
Híbrida
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Equilibrado
Peso
365–375 g
360 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Cork Extreme Deus II

The Cork Extreme Deus II scores like a competent all-rounder: power 82 and control 76 in a teardrop that sits comfortably between attack and construction, with fair comfort 70 and tolerance 69. Played blind, it is a decent intermediate frame. The problem is the invoice: value 48 is among the lower scores we publish, because Cork's boutique pricing puts this card against frames that outgun it at half the money. Core and face documentation is also incomplete, so demo before considering. If the brand's exclusivity is the appeal, that is a legitimate preference; on playing merit alone, the market offers far better deals.

584en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05