padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 9 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 82/100 de la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+15). La Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV responde en punto dulce (+9). En precio, la Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 está actualmente €270 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
General
91/100Mejor
82/100
Control
74
76Mejor
Potencia
94Mejor
79
Punto dulce
61
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
72Mejor
Comodidad
62
71Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Forma
Diamante
Híbrida
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Peso
365–375 g
360 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

492en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05