padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition
Vibor A

Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 13 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 78/100 de la Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+14). La Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition responde en punto dulce (+3).

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition
General
91/100Mejor
78/100
Control
74Mejor
67
Potencia
94Mejor
80
Punto dulce
61
64Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
67Mejor
Comodidad
62
65Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition
Forma
Diamante
Lágrima
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Equilibrado
Peso
365–375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Vibor A Black Mamba Classic Edition

The Black Mamba Classic Edition is the 2022 vintage of Vibor-A's icon: an even-balanced teardrop with an EVA core scoring power 80, the famous bite in period form. The terms aged as the brand always writes them: control 67, comfort 65, tolerance 64. Weight documentation is incomplete on remaining stock, and stock is genuinely old now. Value 74 is fair for what has become a semi-collectible frame. The honest position: newer Mambas hit harder and handle better, but the Classic carries the mythology at the smallest invoice. Devotees and completists know what to do; inspect condition first.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05