padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly

Veredicto PRR

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia gana por 12 puntos

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia obtiene 93/100 frente a 81/100 de la Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+15).

Desglose de puntuación
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
General
93/100Mejor
81/100
Control
84Mejor
69
Potencia
88Mejor
84
Punto dulce
68
68
Manejabilidad
76Mejor
64
Comodidad
70
70
Especificaciones
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
Forma
Lágrima
Lágrima
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
360–375 g
380 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 18K
Nivel
Profesional
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

215en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly

The RP 36 Aniversario Poly celebrates thirty-six years of Royal Padel's stubborn craft: a 380 g teardrop around the house polyethylene core, striking deep and elastic with power 84, the strongest number the poly line produces. Comfort 70 keeps the tradition of softness under mass. The familiar costs apply: maneuverability 64 wants deliberate positioning, control 69 wants early targets, and core documentation is incomplete in our records. Value 72 is decent for a commemorative build. For poly devotees this is the one to own from recent years; for newcomers to the feel, demo the standard Whip first.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05