padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 17 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 74/100 de la Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+22). La Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia responde en punto dulce (+11). En precio, la Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia está actualmente €96 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
74/100
91/100Mejor
Control
70
78Mejor
Potencia
68
90Mejor
Punto dulce
77Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
80Mejor
72
Comodidad
76Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
325 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia

The AT10 Genius Ultralight is Tapia's name on 325 g, the lightest frame we score: maneuverability 80, comfort 76 and tolerance 77 define an experience where the racket simply never arrives late or argues. Power 68 and control 70 are the transparent physics of the weight. Value 80 is fair for the speciality. The audience is precise: juniors stepping up, players managing serious arm trouble, and net specialists who count every gram. For them, nothing else serves quite like this; for standard arms, it is a lovely answer to a question they have not asked.

64en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05