padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 17 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 74/100 da Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+22). A Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia responde em ponto doce (+11). Em preço, a Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia está atualmente €96 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
74/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
70
78Melhor
Potência
68
90Melhor
Ponto doce
77Melhor
66
Manobrabilidade
80Melhor
72
Conforto
76Melhor
67
Especificações
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
325 g
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Nox At10 Genius Ultralight By Agustin Tapia

The AT10 Genius Ultralight is Tapia's name on 325 g, the lightest frame we score: maneuverability 80, comfort 76 and tolerance 77 define an experience where the racket simply never arrives late or argues. Power 68 and control 70 are the transparent physics of the weight. Value 80 is fair for the speciality. The audience is precise: juniors stepping up, players managing serious arm trouble, and net specialists who count every gram. For them, nothing else serves quite like this; for standard arms, it is a lovely answer to a question they have not asked.

64em PadelProShopAnálise e preços
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05