padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Carbon Revolution 2 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Siux Carbon Revolution 2
Siux

Siux Carbon Revolution 2

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 15 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 76/100 de la Siux Carbon Revolution 2. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+16). La Siux Carbon Revolution 2 responde en punto dulce (+3).

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Carbon Revolution 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
76/100
91/100Mejor
Control
70
78Mejor
Potencia
74
90Mejor
Punto dulce
69Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
72
72
Comodidad
70Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Siux Carbon Revolution 2
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Cabeza ligera
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 6k
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Siux Carbon Revolution 2

The Carbon Revolution 2 is Siux's head-light mid-tier: a 6K face over an EVA core scoring a moderate 74/70 power-control split with fair terms (comfort 70, tolerance 69) and prompt handling (72). Value 74 is reasonable. The card sits in the crowded middle of Siux's own catalogue, below the Trilogy's polish and the Fenix's pace, which makes the buying case dependent on discounts. The head-light tune and direct 6K report are the personality; the numbers are competent everywhere and compelling nowhere. A pleasant frame that needs a price cut to argue for itself.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05