padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red vs Softee Trionic Light

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Softee Trionic Light
Softee

Softee Trionic Light

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 23 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 68/100 de la Softee Trionic Light. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+24). La Softee Trionic Light responde en punto dulce (+4).

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Light
General
91/100Mejor
68/100
Control
78Mejor
65
Potencia
90Mejor
66
Punto dulce
66
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
72
73Mejor
Comodidad
67
70Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Light
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
340 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA suave
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Fibra de vidrio
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Softee Trionic Light

The Trionic Light is Softee's featherweight offer: a 340 g even-balanced Soft EVA build under a fibreglass face scoring maneuverability 73 with kind terms (comfort 70, tolerance 70) and a gentle 66/65 split. Value 78 is honest. At this weight the brand's usual value-shelf story gains a real distinction: 340 g with documentation is scarce at Softee money, which matters to lighter-framed players and arm-managers more than any badge. The benchmarks still lead on outright arithmetic; the Trionic argues on grams instead, and fairly.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05