padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red vs Softee Trionic Light

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Softee Trionic Light
Softee

Softee Trionic Light

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 23 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 68/100 da Softee Trionic Light. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+24). A Softee Trionic Light responde em ponto doce (+4).

Detalhe da pontuação
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Light
Geral
91/100Melhor
68/100
Controlo
78Melhor
65
Potência
90Melhor
66
Ponto doce
66
70Melhor
Manobrabilidade
72
73Melhor
Conforto
67
70Melhor
Especificações
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Light
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
340 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA suave
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Fibra de vidro
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços
Softee Trionic Light

The Trionic Light is Softee's featherweight offer: a 340 g even-balanced Soft EVA build under a fibreglass face scoring maneuverability 73 with kind terms (comfort 70, tolerance 70) and a gentle 66/65 split. Value 78 is honest. At this weight the brand's usual value-shelf story gains a real distinction: 340 g with documentation is scarce at Softee money, which matters to lighter-framed players and arm-managers more than any badge. The benchmarks still lead on outright arithmetic; the Trionic argues on grams instead, and fairly.

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05