padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Melhor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin
Kombat

Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin

Veredito PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 ganha por 14 pontos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtém 91/100 contra 77/100 da Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+17). A Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin responde em ponto doce (+6). Em preço, a Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin está atualmente €63 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin
Geral
91/100Melhor
77/100
Controlo
74Melhor
70
Potência
94Melhor
77
Ponto doce
61
67Melhor
Manobrabilidade
66
70Melhor
Conforto
62
68Melhor
Especificações
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin
Forma
Diamante
Diamante
Balanço
Cabeça pesada
Peso
365–375 g
360–370 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 3K
Carbon 18K
Nível
Avançado
Avançado
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Polivalente
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223em PadelProShopAnálise e preços
Kombat Teide 2026 By Manu Martin

The Kombat Teide 2026 by Manu Martin is a mid-tier teardrop-shaped racket aimed at intermediate players seeking a balance between power and control, but it lacks the refined feel and engineering precision of established brands at a similar price point. On court it delivers adequate drive depth but can feel somewhat hollow and inconsistent on off-centre contacts, making it less forgiving than competitors. Players loyal to the Kombat brand or drawn in by the Manu Martin signature will find it functional, but value-conscious buyers should look closely at alternatives from Bullpadel or Head in the same price bracket.

160em PadelMarketAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05