padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4 vs Adidas Adipower 3.2

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4
Adidas

Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4

Adidas Adipower 3.2
Adidas

Adidas Adipower 3.2

82
PRR verdict

Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4 wins by 5 points

Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4 scores 87/100 against 82/100 for the Adidas Adipower 3.2. Its biggest edge is control (+20). The Adidas Adipower 3.2 answers back on power (+8).

Score breakdown
Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4
Adidas Adipower 3.2
Overall
87/100Best
82/100
Control
90Best
70
Power
77
85Best
Sweet spot
77Best
64
Maneuverability
74Best
68
Comfort
76Best
66
Specs
Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4
Adidas Adipower 3.2
Shape
Round
Diamond
Balance
Even
Head-heavy
Weight
365 g
360–375 g
Core
EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Level
Advanced
Advanced
Playing style
Control
Power
Adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.4

The Multiweight Ctrl 3.4 refines adidas's adjustable control frame: an even-balanced 365 g build with an EVA core tuned for absorption, and control 90 that puts lobs and blocks exactly where the point needs them. Tolerance 77 and comfort 76 continue the line's arm-friendly tradition, and the Multiweight hardware means you can nudge the character toward attack as your game grows. Power 77 stays the deliberate limitation. At value 79 it is priced sensibly for advanced tacticians. Between this and the 3.3, pick by feel preference; both are precision instruments with a safety margin.

Adidas Adipower 3.2

The Adipower 3.2 is two flagship generations old, which is exactly why it belongs on a shortlist: power 85 from the head-heavy build and 3K face remains completely current, while value 80 reflects pricing the newer 3.3 and 3.4 cannot match. The strike is classic Adipower: direct, informative, keen to finish. The terms aged less: control 70, comfort 66 and tolerance 64 assume sound technique and a durable arm. Remaining stock is the only real risk. For advanced attackers who want flagship-line hitting and let others pay the new-season premium, the 3.2 is the smart vintage.

120at PadelMarketReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05