padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl vs Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl
Adidas

Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl

83
Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega
Adidas

Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega

82
PRR verdict

Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl wins by 1 point

Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl scores 83/100 against 82/100 for the Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega. Its biggest edge is control (+6). The Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega answers back on power (+4). On price, the Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl is currently €26 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl
Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega
Overall
83/100Best
82/100
Control
84Best
78
Power
74
78Best
Sweet spot
75Best
72
Maneuverability
74
74
Comfort
74Best
73
Specs
Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl
Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega
Shape
Hybrid
Diamond
Balance
Even
Weight
365 g
360–375 g
Core
Multi-EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Carbon 15k
Level
Intermediate
Advanced
Playing style
Control
Power
Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl

The Adidas Cross It Carbon Ctrl 2026 is a hybrid control frame for intermediate players who want precision without committing to a head-heavy diamond. Control at 84 is the clear strength, and the even balance and 365 g weight make it stable and accessible across all court positions. The multi-foam core and Carbon 3K face deliver a responsive, predictable feel. Power at 74 is honest rather than explosive. PRR score: 83/100.

201at PadelProShopReview & prices
Adidas Cross It 3.4 Marta Ortega

Marta Ortega's Cross It 3.4 is one of adidas's best-judged signature frames: a 15K carbon face over an EVA core, offered in a 360 to 375 g spread, with power 78 and control 78 in exact equilibrium. The strike is precise without harshness, comfort 73 and tolerance 72 keep it kind, and maneuverability 74 suits the fast, complete game Ortega plays. Nothing on the card punishes; nothing disappoints. Value 72 is fair for signature quality. For advanced all-courters, particularly those who want one frame for every phase of the point, the 3.4 is quietly excellent and easy to recommend.

227at PadelMarketReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05