padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega vs Siux Electra Pro SE Black

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega
Adidas

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega

80
Best
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Siux

Siux Electra Pro SE Black

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro SE Black wins by 11 points

Siux Electra Pro SE Black scores 91/100 against 80/100 for the Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega. Its biggest edge is power (+26). The Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega answers back on sweet spot (+18). On price, the Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega is currently €207 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Overall
80/100
91/100Best
Control
78
78
Power
64
90Best
Sweet spot
84Best
66
Maneuverability
86Best
72
Comfort
82Best
67
Specs
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Shape
Diamond
Round
Balance
Weight
345–360 g
Core
Soft EVA
Face material
Carbon / Fibreglass
Level
Advanced
Intermediate
Playing style
Control
Versatile
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT 3.4 2025 Martha Ortega

Marta Ortega's Cross IT Light 3.4 is one of the most specialised frames we score: 340 g with a Soft EVA core and carbon-fibreglass face, producing maneuverability 86, tolerance 84 and comfort 82, the kindest, quickest combination in the current market. The frame is simply never late and never harsh. Power 64 is the deliberate, total trade: winners come from position and patience, full stop. Value 70 reflects signature pricing on a niche spec. For players managing injury, prioritising hands absolutely, or wanting the lightest serious frame available, it is close to unique; for anyone else it is a lovely thing built for someone else.

152at PadelProShopReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro SE Black

The Electra Pro SE Black scores like a serious attacking frame: power 90 with control 78 puts it in flagship territory, and the profile suggests a player who wants to finish points from mid-court and trust drives under pressure. Comfort 67 and tolerance 66 tell the other half of the story: this is a firm, demanding hit that expects clean contact and a conditioned arm. Full specification for this special edition is unconfirmed, so we would not assert materials or balance we cannot verify. At value 62 it is priced ambitiously; demo one before you commit.

359at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05