Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 vs Enebe Response Royal
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 wins by 21 points
Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 scores 94/100 against 73/100 for the Enebe Response Royal. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+26).
“The Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 takes the same 365g Black EVA formula that already works on the Technical Viper Soft and wraps it in Juan Lebrón's signature diamond shell. Power eases back from the standard Viper JL's tour-level peak to a still-strong 82, and in exchange control and comfort both climb into the high 70s/80s — a genuinely balanced racket rather than a compromise. Maneuverability improves too, so the head-heavy diamond feels less punishing to hustle at net. The catch is coverage: it is stocked at a single retailer so far, and priced at parity with the far more aggressive standard Viper JL, so this is not the discount play the Technical Soft is.”
“The Response Royal is the soft entry of Enebe's Response family: an HR3 core under a fibreglass face scoring power 74 with the liveliest terms in the line's lower tier (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is honest. The HR3 spring plus fibreglass civility makes this the Response for improving players not yet ready for the 24K's crisp demands. The family rule is well-worn by now: Enebe's shelf is crowded and honest, so buy the edition whose feel and price align in the week you shop.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
