Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia wins by 15 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia scores 91/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is control (+12). On price, the Enebe Combat 7.1 V 2 is currently €107 cheaper.
“The Combat 7.1 V2 is Enebe's lively mid-tier attacker: an HR3 foam core under a 3K face scoring power 78 with the springy response the foam brings. Control 68, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold the standard firm line, and weight documentation is incomplete. Value 78 is strong. The HR3 core is the differentiator within Enebe's own crowded shelf: where the Mustang hits dense and direct, the Combat hits lively and quick. Between them, buy on feel preference and the week's price; both are honest working-brand attackers with sound arithmetic.”
“The 12K Alum Xtrem is the AT10 for players who want Tapia's attacking DNA with a slightly softer entry point. The 12K carbon face reads a touch more forgiving than the 18K on off-pace contact, while the teardrop shape and even balance keep the frame honest through bandejas and transitions. Power 88 finishes points; control 80 keeps the rest of your game intact. Comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are the familiar tax on a frame this capable. At value 78 it undercuts the flagship while giving away very little, which makes it the sensible pick in the range.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
