Enebe Response 24K Enebe Response 24K vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 19 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 79/100 for the Enebe Response 24K Enebe Response 24K. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+28). On price, the Enebe Response 24K Enebe Response 24K is currently €157 cheaper.
“The Response 24K is Enebe's premium-face play: an HR3 foam core under a genuine 24K weave at working-brand money. The strike is the argument: crisp, dense, expensive-sounding, with power 81 backing it up. Control 69, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold standard firm terms, and maneuverability 68 wants some anticipation. Value 78 is strong: nothing else with this face spec costs this little. For improving attackers who want the premium report without the premium invoice, the Response 24K is one of the quiet bargains of the season. Demo it before the market notices.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool