Enebe Response vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 25 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 73/100 for the Enebe Response. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+27).
“The standard Response 2025 is the plainest member of Enebe's crowded family: Black EVA under a 3K face scoring power 74 with fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 matches the family standard. The Response tier's internal ranking is settled by now: the 24K leads on face and arithmetic, the Royal leads on liveliness, and this base edition leads only when it is the week's cheapest. Enebe remains one of the market's honest working brands; this is simply its most interchangeable product.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool