Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia vs Siux Ultra Pro
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia wins by 11 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia scores 91/100 against 80/100 for the Siux Ultra Pro. Its biggest edge is power (+10). The Siux Ultra Pro answers back on sweet spot (+1). On price, the Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia is currently €1 cheaper.
“The 12K Alum Xtrem is the AT10 for players who want Tapia's attacking DNA with a slightly softer entry point. The 12K carbon face reads a touch more forgiving than the 18K on off-pace contact, while the teardrop shape and even balance keep the frame honest through bandejas and transitions. Power 88 finishes points; control 80 keeps the rest of your game intact. Comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are the familiar tax on a frame this capable. At value 78 it undercuts the flagship while giving away very little, which makes it the sensible pick in the range.”
“The Siux Ultra Pro is a mid-tier attacking racket with a diamond-leaning balance that rewards aggressive players who can consistently hit the sweet spot, delivering solid smash pace and decent drive depth. The carbon layup feels stiff enough to generate real pop but that rigidity comes at the cost of comfort over long sessions, making it less forgiving on the arm than comparable offerings from Head or Nox at the same price. Intermediate to advanced players looking for a budget-accessible offensive tool will find genuine value here, though those with arm sensitivity or inconsistent technique should look elsewhere.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
