padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

93
PRR
Osaka

Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne

PRR verdict

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia wins by 13 points

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia scores 93/100 against 80/100 for the Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne. Its biggest edge is control (+14).

Score breakdown
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne
Overall
93/100Best
80/100
Control
84Best
70
Power
88Best
81
Sweet spot
68Best
67
Maneuverability
76Best
70
Comfort
70Best
68
Specs
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne
Shape
Teardrop
Round
Balance
Even
Weight
360–375 g
Core
Black EVA
Face material
Carbon 18K
Level
Professional
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Versatile
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

238at PadelProShopReview & prices
Osaka X Raúl Marcos Pro - Power | Champagne

The Osaka x Raúl Marcos Pro Power is a celebrity-collaboration racket that leans heavily on marketing appeal over genuine performance pedigree, offering a diamond-shaped, power-oriented profile with modest EVA foam internals that produce a stiff, somewhat punishing feel on off-centre hits. The brand lacks the R&D depth of established padel houses, meaning the power claims are aspirational rather than truly competitive against similarly priced offerings from Babolat, Head, or Wilson. Intermediate players seeking a conversation piece may find it adequate, but serious competitors will quickly outgrow its limited feedback and inconsistent sweet spot.

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05