padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Royal Padel M27 Poly vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Royal Padel M27 Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel M27 Poly

86
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 5 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 86/100 for the Royal Padel M27 Poly. Its biggest edge is power (+12). The Royal Padel M27 Poly answers back on sweet spot (+8). On price, the Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red is currently €120 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Royal Padel M27 Poly
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
86/100
91/100Best
Control
84Best
78
Power
78
90Best
Sweet spot
74Best
66
Maneuverability
64
72Best
Comfort
74Best
67
Specs
Royal Padel M27 Poly
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
380 g
375 g
Core
EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Level
Professional
Intermediate
Playing style
Control
Power
Royal Padel M27 Poly

The Royal Padel M27 Poly 2026 is defined by its forgiving round shape and poly foam core, delivering a soft, consistent feel that rewards precise ball placement over raw aggression. The head-heavy balance adds unexpected punch for a control-oriented round racket, but at 380g it demands some physical conditioning to sustain through long matches without fatigue creep. Advanced intermediates and club-level players who prioritize touch, net volleys, and arm comfort over explosive smash generation will find it a dependable but not extraordinary option at its price point.

280at PadelMarketReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05