padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 vs Siux Electra Pro SE Black

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Adidas

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Siux

Siux Electra Pro SE Black

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro SE Black gana por 12 puntos

Siux Electra Pro SE Black obtiene 91/100 frente a 79/100 de la Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+26). La Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 responde en punto dulce (+18). En precio, la Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 está actualmente €211 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
General
79/100
91/100Mejor
Control
78
78
Potencia
64
90Mejor
Punto dulce
84Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
86Mejor
72
Comodidad
82Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Siux Electra Pro SE Black
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Cabeza ligera
Peso
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon / Fibreglass
Nivel
Principiante
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Control
Versátil
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3

The Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 is defined by its forgiving round shape and head-light balance, making it easy to swing and redirect balls for complete beginners who are still developing their technique. The EVA foam core and carbon-fibreglass surface blend deliver a soft, muted feel with decent touch but limited power ceiling, meaning players will quickly outgrow it as their game progresses. At its price point it faces stiff competition from better-specced beginner options from Babolat and Head, making the value proposition its weakest link unless purchased on discount.

148en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro SE Black

The Electra Pro SE Black scores like a serious attacking frame: power 90 with control 78 puts it in flagship territory, and the profile suggests a player who wants to finish points from mid-court and trust drives under pressure. Comfort 67 and tolerance 66 tell the other half of the story: this is a firm, demanding hit that expects clean contact and a conditioned arm. Full specification for this special edition is unconfirmed, so we would not assert materials or balance we cannot verify. At value 62 it is priced ambitiously; demo one before you commit.

359en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05