padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Quad Rhino

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Quad Rhino
Quad

Quad Rhino

Veredicto PRR

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia gana por 14 puntos

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia obtiene 93/100 frente a 79/100 de la Quad Rhino. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+14). En precio, la Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia está actualmente €100 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Quad Rhino
General
93/100Mejor
79/100
Control
84Mejor
70
Potencia
88Mejor
80
Punto dulce
68Mejor
67
Manejabilidad
76Mejor
69
Comodidad
70Mejor
68
Especificaciones
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Quad Rhino
Forma
Lágrima
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
360–375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 18K
Nivel
Profesional
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Versátil
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

238en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Quad Rhino

The Quad Rhino is a budget-tier diamond-shape racket from a lesser-known brand with limited market presence and sparse player feedback, making confident assessment difficult. Its aggressive name and diamond shape suggest a power-first orientation, but without documented core specs or widespread player testing, performance consistency and arm comfort are uncertain at best. Budget-conscious beginners curious about a power-oriented shape may find it passable, but most players would be better served by established brands at similar price points.

338en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05