padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk vs Slazenger Epic Pro 12K

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Siux

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Slazenger Epic Pro 12K
Slazenger

Slazenger Epic Pro 12K

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk gana por 18 puntos

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk obtiene 91/100 frente a 73/100 de la Slazenger Epic Pro 12K. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+16). La Slazenger Epic Pro 12K responde en punto dulce (+1).

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Slazenger Epic Pro 12K
General
91/100Mejor
73/100
Control
78Mejor
67
Potencia
90Mejor
74
Punto dulce
66
67Mejor
Manejabilidad
72Mejor
70
Comodidad
67
68Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Slazenger Epic Pro 12K
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
365 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Versátil
Potencia
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Franco Stupaczuk's Shadow Red ST5 is built to attack: power 90 with control 78 is a proper first-strike profile, and the confirmed even balance at 365 g explains why it feels quicker between shots than its hitting power implies. Blocks and counters stay manageable, then the same frame turns a short lob into a finished point. The firm side is unavoidable: comfort 67 and tolerance 66 mean mishits are felt and punished. Beyond balance and weight, full spec for this colourway is unconfirmed, so try before you buy. For aggressive all-court players it is a convincing signature frame.

178en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Slazenger Epic Pro 12K

The Slazenger Epic Pro 12K is a mid-tier power-oriented round racket that delivers decent pace through its 12K carbon surface and EVA foam core, but lacks the precision engineering and refinement found in comparable offerings from Bullpadel, Head, or Babolat at a similar price point. The even balance combined with the round shape creates a somewhat generic feel that neither excels at explosive overhead power nor offers the silky control touch that advanced players demand. Players stepping up from intermediate level who want a recognisable brand name and approachable power profile may find it acceptable, but serious advanced competitors will quickly outgrow its limitations.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05