padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk vs Slazenger Epic 3K

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Siux

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Slazenger Epic 3K
Slazenger

Slazenger Epic 3K

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk gana por 21 puntos

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk obtiene 91/100 frente a 70/100 de la Slazenger Epic 3K. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+20). La Slazenger Epic 3K responde en punto dulce (+2).

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Slazenger Epic 3K
General
91/100Mejor
70/100
Control
78Mejor
65
Potencia
90Mejor
70
Punto dulce
66
68Mejor
Manejabilidad
72Mejor
70
Comodidad
67
68Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Slazenger Epic 3K
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Cabeza ligera
Peso
365 g
Núcleo
Material de la cara
Nivel
Intermedio
Principiante
Estilo de juego
Versátil
Potencia
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Franco Stupaczuk's Shadow Red ST5 is built to attack: power 90 with control 78 is a proper first-strike profile, and the confirmed even balance at 365 g explains why it feels quicker between shots than its hitting power implies. Blocks and counters stay manageable, then the same frame turns a short lob into a finished point. The firm side is unavoidable: comfort 67 and tolerance 66 mean mishits are felt and punished. Beyond balance and weight, full spec for this colourway is unconfirmed, so try before you buy. For aggressive all-court players it is a convincing signature frame.

178en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Slazenger Epic 3K

The Epic 3K brings Slazenger's old racket-sports name to padel's entry tier: a head-light build scoring a balanced 70/65 split with fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (70). Specification is incomplete throughout, the 3K claim included, so the demo is the record. Value 74 is reasonable. The heritage badge is the pitch; the card is competent-generic underneath. For players charmed by the name, fine at a fair price; the documented benchmarks remain the rational entry purchase. Verify the face weave before paying for it.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05