padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk vs Tecnifibre Curva Power

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Siux

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Tecnifibre Curva Power
Tecnifibre

Tecnifibre Curva Power

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk gana por 15 puntos

Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk obtiene 91/100 frente a 76/100 de la Tecnifibre Curva Power. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+13).

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Tecnifibre Curva Power
General
91/100Mejor
76/100
Control
78Mejor
67
Potencia
90Mejor
77
Punto dulce
66Mejor
65
Manejabilidad
72Mejor
68
Comodidad
67Mejor
66
Especificaciones
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk
Tecnifibre Curva Power
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
365 g
365 g
Núcleo
Foam
Material de la cara
Carbon 18K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Versátil
Potencia
Siux Electra ST5 Pro Shadow Red 2026 Franco Stupaczuk

Franco Stupaczuk's Shadow Red ST5 is built to attack: power 90 with control 78 is a proper first-strike profile, and the confirmed even balance at 365 g explains why it feels quicker between shots than its hitting power implies. Blocks and counters stay manageable, then the same frame turns a short lob into a finished point. The firm side is unavoidable: comfort 67 and tolerance 66 mean mishits are felt and punished. Beyond balance and weight, full spec for this colourway is unconfirmed, so try before you buy. For aggressive all-court players it is a convincing signature frame.

178en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Tecnifibre Curva Power

The Curva Power is functionally the Curve Power's twin at 365 g: the same foam core, the same 18K face, the same 77/67 power-control split and firm terms (comfort 66, tolerance 65). Value 70 trails its sibling slightly on current pricing. Two listings this close from one brand usually means regional naming; the practical guidance is identical either way: an 18K face at accessible money for improving attackers who want Tecnifibre's clean report, bought at whichever listing prices lower. Check the specimen's actual weight and buy the cheaper twin.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05