padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Starvie Cork Extreme Black II vs Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Starvie Cork Extreme Black II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Black II

Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Deus II

Veredicto PRR

Demasiado igualadas para decidir solo por puntuación

Ambas palas obtienen 83/100 en las pruebas PRR, así que la elección correcta depende del tacto y las especificaciones. Su mayor ventaja está en punto dulce (+1). La Starvie Cork Extreme Deus II responde en potencia (+1). En precio, la Starvie Cork Extreme Black II está actualmente €39 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Cork Extreme Black II
Cork Extreme Deus II
General
83/100
83/100
Control
76
76
Potencia
81
82Mejor
Punto dulce
70Mejor
69
Manejabilidad
72Mejor
71
Comodidad
71Mejor
70
Especificaciones
Cork Extreme Black II
Cork Extreme Deus II
Forma
Híbrida
Híbrida
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Equilibrado
Peso
360 g
360 g
Núcleo
Foam
Material de la cara
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Cork Extreme Black II

The Cork Extreme Black II is the friendlier of Cork's pair: a 365 g hybrid scoring power 81 and control 76, with comfort 71 and tolerance 70 making it pleasant, forgiving company. As a playing object it is perfectly credible intermediate equipment. As a purchase it is hard to defend: value 50 reflects boutique pricing that puts this card against mainstream frames offering more of everything for substantially less. Core and face documentation is incomplete, which does not help. Buy it if Cork's rarity is the point, and know exactly what the premium is paying for: scarcity, not scores.

544en NINEPADELReseña y precios
Cork Extreme Deus II

The Cork Extreme Deus II scores like a competent all-rounder: power 82 and control 76 in a teardrop that sits comfortably between attack and construction, with fair comfort 70 and tolerance 69. Played blind, it is a decent intermediate frame. The problem is the invoice: value 48 is among the lower scores we publish, because Cork's boutique pricing puts this card against frames that outgun it at half the money. Core and face documentation is also incomplete, so demo before considering. If the brand's exclusivity is the appeal, that is a legitimate preference; on playing merit alone, the market offers far better deals.

583en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05