padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Starvie Cork Extreme Black II vs Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Starvie Cork Extreme Black II
Starvie

Cork Extreme Black II

Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Starvie

Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

Veredicto PRR

Starvie Cork Extreme Black II gana por 1 punto

Starvie Cork Extreme Black II obtiene 83/100 frente a 82/100 de la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+2). En precio, la Starvie Cork Supreme Hybrid IV está actualmente €56 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Cork Extreme Black II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
General
83/100Mejor
82/100
Control
76
76
Potencia
81Mejor
79
Punto dulce
70
70
Manejabilidad
72
72
Comodidad
71
71
Especificaciones
Cork Extreme Black II
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV
Forma
Híbrida
Híbrida
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Peso
360 g
360 g
Núcleo
Foam
Material de la cara
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Cork Extreme Black II

The Cork Extreme Black II is the friendlier of Cork's pair: a 365 g hybrid scoring power 81 and control 76, with comfort 71 and tolerance 70 making it pleasant, forgiving company. As a playing object it is perfectly credible intermediate equipment. As a purchase it is hard to defend: value 50 reflects boutique pricing that puts this card against mainstream frames offering more of everything for substantially less. Core and face documentation is incomplete, which does not help. Buy it if Cork's rarity is the point, and know exactly what the premium is paying for: scarcity, not scores.

544en NINEPADELReseña y precios
Cork Supreme Hybrid IV

The Supreme Hybrid IV rounds out Cork's range with the same story as its siblings: a perfectly credible card, power 79, control 76, comfort 71, tolerance 70, wrapped in pricing that produces value 50. The 360 g hybrid plays a pleasant, versatile club game and would earn a straightforward recommendation at mainstream money. Specification is undocumented, so a demo is mandatory rather than advisable. The purchase logic remains what it is across this brand: you are paying a substantial premium for scarcity and the story. On playing merit per euro, the mainstream mid-market wins this comparison every time.

488en NINEPADELReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05